DR. SUBHASH KAPILA
“It has for one thing, moved the level of bilateral
relationship to a higher degree and, for another, formally brought Bangladesh on the strategic radar of the United States .
Clinton’s comments covered both the internal political situation as well as the
strategic compulsions” ----The Daily Star, Bangladesh, Editorial of May 7 2012 on US Secretary of
State visit to Dhaka on May 5, 2012
The new stronger American focus on Bangladesh can
be gauged from American media and other documents. In one recent Wall Street
Journal article it was written that “Bangladesh
is the standard –bearer of South Asia ”. In a
Congressional Research Paper it was reflected that not surprisingly, Bangladesh is the ‘partner of choice for the United States
in many of the foreign policy priorities of President Obama”
In the overall geopolitics of South Asia any US strategic relationship or strategic
partnership with Bangladesh
does not create policy complexities for the United
States in relation to India and the US-India Strategic
Partnership. Unlike Pakistan , Bangladesh
and India
are not in an adversarial or confrontational ode even though some irritants
exist especially on water-sharing.
Therefore, the ‘Joint Declaration of Bangladesh-United
States Dialogue on Partnership’ signed by the two nations during US Secretary
Of State Clinton’s visit to Dhaka on May 05 2012 needs to be viewed in this
light and without any misgivings.
The main purpose of the Joint Declaration seems to be
putting Bangladesh-United States security dialogues and strategic discussions
on a regular higher level and in a structured mode.
The major questions that arise from the United States strategic cynosure on Bangladesh and the Joint Declaration will
logically what it portends for India
and China and how would a
Bangladesh-United States Strategic Partnership once fully consummated impact on
the security interests of India
and China ?
As far as India
is concerned there are two opposing portents that come to the fore. The first
being a positive one in hat India views this development as one of a logical
extension of the US-India Strategic Partnership transplanted onto a wider strategic
canvass carrying positive security advantages for all three nations. It carries
the nucleus of a US-India-Bangladesh Strategic Trilateral emerging.
The opposite portent, a highly improbable one, is that a Bangladesh -United States Strategic Partnership
as a bipartite security understanding at some later stage may emerge on the
same pattern of United States
security linkage with Pakistan
and all the attendant negative security connotations in its wake for India .
However, what is definitely intriguing is the American
emphasis on Bangladesh ’s
role in the maritime security of the Bay of Bengal and the Indian
Ocean . One would have thought that the United
States under its Strategic Partnership understandings
with India would have
acceded that role to India
as the dominant naval power in the region. What maritime role for Bangladesh in the Bay of Bengal is the United States
envisaging?
The biggest impact of any evolutionary Bangladesh-United
States strategic partnership would be on China
with which Bangladesh
has a Strategic Partnership Agreement. In Bangladesh
policy circles, despite a lack of geographical contiguity, China was viewed as a countervailing power to India as the
outsized and predominant power in the region.
In Chinese strategic perceptions, the coupling of the United
States-India Strategic Partnership with increasing security cooperation between
Bangladesh and the United States
is going to be perceived as hostile.
In terms of domestic
politics, this is a big triumph for PM Sheikh Hasina and her policies of
moderation and zero tolerance for Islamist terrorism. Also in terms of domestic
dynamics the linkage to the United States
may rob the India- baiters
of some of their rationale for berating India and thereby distorting
Bangladeshi foreign policies.
Concluding, what
needs to be said is that this is a positive gain for the South Asian security
environment even if in the process India
may have to marginally subordinate its role in Bangladesh . The better way of
looking at it would be that the United States
may have elected for India
and the United States to bat
together in complementary roles for security and stability on South
Asia ’s eastern flank.
First published in South Asia Analysis Group (SAAG), 15 May 2012
Dr Subhash Kapila is an International Relations and
Strategic Affairs analyst. He is Consultant, Strategic Affairs with South Asia
Analysis Group. Email: drsubhashkapila.007@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment